Divisibility and Tie Breaking Rules in Experimental Duopoly Markets1
نویسنده
چکیده
This study investigates experimentally pricing behavior of sellers in duopoly markets with posted prices and market power. The two treatment variables are given by divisibility of the price space and tie breaking rules. A change in divisibility is modeled by making the sellers’ price space finer or coarser. The second treatment variable deals with the rule under which demanded units are allocated between sellers in case of a price tie. We find that lower divisibility tends to generate lower prices. Furthermore, posted prices and the incidence of perfect collusion are significantly higher under the sharing tie breaking rule than under the random (coin-toss) one. Puzzello: Department of Economics, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, 403 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2056, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. This research was supported by the Center of International Business Education and Research and the Purdue Research Foundation. We thank for constructive comments Gabriele Camera, Marco Casari, Tim Cason, and Dan Kovenock.
منابع مشابه
Assigning more students to their top choices: A comparison of tie-breaking rules
School districts that implement stable matchings face various decisions that affect students’ assignments to schools. We study properties of the rank distribution of students with random preferences when schools use different tie-breaking rules to rank equivalent students. Under a single tie-breaking rule, where all schools use the same ranking, a constant fraction of students are assigned to o...
متن کاملConvergence of iterative voting
In multiagent systems, social choice functions can help aggregate the distinct preferences that agents have over alternatives, enabling them to settle on a single choice. Despite the basic manipulability of all reasonable voting systems, it would still be desirable to find ways to reach a stable result, i.e., a situation where no agent would wish to change its vote. One possibility is an iterat...
متن کاملOn manipulation in multi-winner elections based on scoring rules
Multi-winner elections model scenarios where voters must select a fixed-size group of candidates based on their individual preferences. In such scenarios, it is often the case that voters are incentivized to manipulate, i.e. misreport their preferences in order to obtain a better outcome. In this paper, we study the complexity of manipulating multiwinner elections under scoring rules, with a pa...
متن کاملConvergence of Iterative Scoring Rules
In multiagent systems, social choice functions can help aggregate the distinct preferences that agents have over alternatives, enabling them to settle on a single choice. Despite the basic manipulability of all reasonable voting systems, it would still be desirable to find ways to reach plausible outcomes, which are stable states, i.e., a situation where no agent would wish to change its vote. ...
متن کاملA 2 × 2 Game without the Fictitious Play Property ∗
The definition of fictitious play may depend on first move rules, initial beliefs, weights assigned to initial beliefs, and tie-breaking rules determining the particular best replies chosen at each stage. Using the original definition of Brown (1951) in which the first moves are chosen arbitrarily and no tie-breaking rules are assumed, we give an example of a fictitious play process in a 2 × 2 ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005